<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Banning the Bomb &#8230; The First Human Right: to Live</title>
	<atom:link href="http://prism-magazine.com/2010/05/banning-the-bomb-the-first-human-right-to-live/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://prism-magazine.com/2010/05/banning-the-bomb-the-first-human-right-to-live/</link>
	<description>News and Views That Matter</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sat, 04 Feb 2012 20:29:09 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.2.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Jeff</title>
		<link>http://prism-magazine.com/2010/05/banning-the-bomb-the-first-human-right-to-live/comment-page-1/#comment-1056</link>
		<dc:creator>Jeff</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 09 Jul 2010 22:17:27 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://prism-magazine.com/?p=979#comment-1056</guid>
		<description>A terrorist organization already has nuclear weapons &#8211; the United States government headed by Barack &quot;Obomba&quot;. 
 
And they have no intention of ever voluntarily giving up nuclear weapons. Obama will have his finger poised over the nuclear button for as long as he remains president. 
 
Obama will never &quot;earn&quot; his Peace Prize retroactively. He is already the world&#039;s biggest warmonger. </description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>A terrorist organization already has nuclear weapons &ndash; the United States government headed by Barack &quot;Obomba&quot;.</p>
<p>And they have no intention of ever voluntarily giving up nuclear weapons. Obama will have his finger poised over the nuclear button for as long as he remains president.</p>
<p>Obama will never &quot;earn&quot; his Peace Prize retroactively. He is already the world&#39;s biggest warmonger.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: opit</title>
		<link>http://prism-magazine.com/2010/05/banning-the-bomb-the-first-human-right-to-live/comment-page-1/#comment-918</link>
		<dc:creator>opit</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 21 Jun 2010 16:02:53 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://prism-magazine.com/?p=979#comment-918</guid>
		<description>Sorry. Common flaw. Interventions in Iran. </description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Sorry. Common flaw. Interventions in Iran.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: opit</title>
		<link>http://prism-magazine.com/2010/05/banning-the-bomb-the-first-human-right-to-live/comment-page-1/#comment-917</link>
		<dc:creator>opit</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 21 Jun 2010 15:59:03 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://prism-magazine.com/?p=979#comment-917</guid>
		<description>&quot;Eliminating all nuclear weapons - every last one - has been official U.S. policy under successive administrations.&quot; 
 
I do not believe this to be a true statement of affairs for one millisecond. Rather, that is the Mission Statement which has justified persecuting nations without nuclear arms by the nation with stupendous overkill and international capacity for destruction - and has had for decades. 
If in fact that was the objective, then the &#039;Axis of Evil&#039; would never have been promulgated about those nations which signed on to an international treaty to provide reassurance to neighbouring countries that they are not engaging in WMD research. 
Iraq 
Iran 
North Korea 
Iraq has already been futilely invaded,occupied and destroyed. United States unilateral sanctions have economically harmed both Iran and North Korea. 
I liked North Korea&#039;s response when the UN Security Council braced it about atomic tests. There have been 2054 nuclear tests on this planet. We have done 2. You have done the rest. Yet  we are the problem ? 
This little Japanese visual on tests is remarkable in the clarity it provides.  &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.ctbto.org/specials/1945-1998-by-isao-hashimoto/&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;http://www.ctbto.org/specials/1945-1998-by-isao-h...&lt;/a&gt;  
 
Any cursory reading of the Nuclear NonProliferation Treaty must reveal the Third Pillar : where signatories are assured freedom to responsibly use nuclear power. How is it then, that the triumph of U.S. technology under the Shah becomes a gateway to weaponry ? Was the U.S. that reckless in providing fusion technology basically incompatible with weapons technology to its then vassal state ? And are the Russians supplying fuel and tech for power generation suddenly going to enable a threat in their backyard when they have no need or desire to do so ? 
Such thinking ignores the lessons of the Cuban Missile crisis, which was really a response to U.S. nuclear arms situated in Turkey. 
 
So where are we today ? With Israel&#039;s recently recognized H-Bomb threat used against Iran. Not that the U.S. is uninvolved. 
Full text of Iran&#039;s letter of complaint to the UN over US threats of nuclear attack  &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.campaigniran.org/casmii/index.php?q=node/9806&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;http://www.campaigniran.org/casmii/index.php?q=no...&lt;/a&gt;  
 
I invite you to investigate the website Campaign Against Sanctions and Military Interventions in Iraq. It gives one a far different assessment of matters than will be derived from the previous article. </description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>&quot;Eliminating all nuclear weapons &#8211; every last one &#8211; has been official U.S. policy under successive administrations.&quot;</p>
<p>I do not believe this to be a true statement of affairs for one millisecond. Rather, that is the Mission Statement which has justified persecuting nations without nuclear arms by the nation with stupendous overkill and international capacity for destruction &#8211; and has had for decades.</p>
<p>If in fact that was the objective, then the &#39;Axis of Evil&#39; would never have been promulgated about those nations which signed on to an international treaty to provide reassurance to neighbouring countries that they are not engaging in WMD research.</p>
<p>Iraq</p>
<p>Iran</p>
<p>North Korea</p>
<p>Iraq has already been futilely invaded,occupied and destroyed. United States unilateral sanctions have economically harmed both Iran and North Korea.</p>
<p>I liked North Korea&#39;s response when the UN Security Council braced it about atomic tests. There have been 2054 nuclear tests on this planet. We have done 2. You have done the rest. Yet  we are the problem ?</p>
<p>This little Japanese visual on tests is remarkable in the clarity it provides.<br />
  <a href="http://www.ctbto.org/specials/1945-1998-by-isao-hashimoto/" rel="nofollow">http://www.ctbto.org/specials/1945-1998-by-isao-h&#8230;</a>  </p>
<p>Any cursory reading of the Nuclear NonProliferation Treaty must reveal the Third Pillar : where signatories are assured freedom to responsibly use nuclear power. How is it then, that the triumph of U.S. technology under the Shah becomes a gateway to weaponry ? Was the U.S. that reckless in providing fusion technology basically incompatible with weapons technology to its then vassal state ? And are the Russians supplying fuel and tech for power generation suddenly going to enable a threat in their backyard when they have no need or desire to do so ?</p>
<p>Such thinking ignores the lessons of the Cuban Missile crisis, which was really a response to U.S. nuclear arms situated in Turkey.</p>
<p>So where are we today ? With Israel&#39;s recently recognized H-Bomb threat used against Iran. Not that the U.S. is uninvolved.</p>
<p>Full text of Iran&#39;s letter of complaint to the UN over US threats of nuclear attack<br />
  <a href="http://www.campaigniran.org/casmii/index.php?q=node/9806" rel="nofollow">http://www.campaigniran.org/casmii/index.php?q=no&#8230;</a>  </p>
<p>I invite you to investigate the website Campaign Against Sanctions and Military Interventions in Iraq. It gives one a far different assessment of matters than will be derived from the previous article.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

